Legal Opinion

Fu v. Owens

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 6, 2010No. 09-2489PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Helen Fu and Ebonie Owens both worked for the Medcor clinic in the Knoll-wood, Minnesota Target retail store. One day Owens physically attacked Fu causing several injuries. Medcor terminated Owens. Fu applied for benefits under the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Act (WCA). After initially paying some benefits, Medcor’s insurance carrier denied the claim, contending that the injuries were the result of an intentional act. Subsequently, Fu and her husband, Steven, sued Medcor in state court under several common-law theories and brought one federal claim under the Americans…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Judy A. Libel v. Adventure Lands of America, Inc. John M. KrantzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  2. McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Cunningham v. City of Thief River FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. Murphy v. KeatingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Johnson v. Ramsey CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Glen Johnson v. Charps Welding & FabricatingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  2. Malone v. AMEREN UECourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. Hawkins v. County of LincolnDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2011
  4. Garrison v. Dolgencorp, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2017
  5. John Ekblad v. ISD No. 625Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API