Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Hipp v. Murray
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 20, 2008No. 2007AP230-WPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.
¶ 1. The Honorable Marshall B. Murray seeks review of a published court of appeals decision granting a writ of mandamus. The writ directed him upon remand to permit the complainant, Adrian Hipp, to have subpoenas issued for those persons he listed as witnesses for a John Doe hearing.1 The court of appeals concluded that clerks of court may issue subpoenas for John Doe hearings.
¶ 2. Judge Murray maintains that under Wis. Stat. § 968.26, a John Doe judge has exclusive authority to subpoena witnesses for a John Doe hearing. He argues that the court of appeals erred in determining that John Doe…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kurkierewicz v. CannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. WashingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Reimann v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Hutson v. State Personnel CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. O'CONNORWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cynthia Archer v. John ChisholmCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- John K. Maciver Inst. for Pub. Policy, Inc. v. SchmitzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- State v. LongWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. WarbeltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Hipp v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.