Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Reimann v. Circuit Court for Dane County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1997No. 96-2361-WPublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonald W. Steinmetz, J.

¶1. There is one issue presented for review: when a person complains to a circuit court judge that such person believes a crime has been committed within that judge's jurisdiction, does Wis. Stat. § 968.26 1 (1995-96) 2 require the judge to examine under oath the complainant and any witnesses produced by him or her. We conclude that Wis. Stat. § 968.26 requires a circuit court judge to conduct such an examination only when the complainant has sufficiently established that he or she has "reason to believe" that a crime has been committed within that judge's jurisdiction.

¶ 2. This is a review…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. State v. BentleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. DoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Cynthia Archer v. John ChisholmCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. County of Jefferson v. RenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Custodian of Records for the Legislative Technology Services Bureau v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State Ex Rel. Two Unnamed v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API