State Ex Rel. Reimann v. Circuit Court for Dane County
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonald W. Steinmetz, J.
¶1. There is one issue presented for review: when a person complains to a circuit court judge that such person believes a crime has been committed within that judge's jurisdiction, does Wis. Stat. § 968.26 1 (1995-96) 2 require the judge to examine under oath the complainant and any witnesses produced by him or her. We conclude that Wis. Stat. § 968.26 requires a circuit court judge to conduct such an examination only when the complainant has sufficiently established that he or she has "reason to believe" that a crime has been committed within that judge's jurisdiction.
¶ 2. This is a review…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- State v. BentleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. DoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Cynthia Archer v. John ChisholmCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- County of Jefferson v. RenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Custodian of Records for the Legislative Technology Services Bureau v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Two Unnamed v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.