State v. Warbelton
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.
¶ 1. The petitioner, Jeffrey A. Warbelton, seeks review of a published court of appeals decision affirming his conviction for stalking. Under Wis. Stat. § 940.32(2m)(a) (2001-02), 2 whoever commits the crime of stalking is guilty of a Class H felony if the actor has a previous conviction for a violent crime. Warbelton stipulated that he had been convicted of a prior violent crime. Over his objection, the stipulation was admitted into evidence and the issue was submitted to the jury for its determination.
¶ 2. Warbelton asserts that because a prior conviction for a violent crime is a penalty…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. SveumCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- State v. David GutierrezWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. HemmingwayCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
- State v. ConnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- v. ViburgColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.