State v. Long
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.
¶ 1. Michael Scott Long seeks review of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals affirming his conviction and sentence for second-degree sexual assault and false imprisonment. He asserts that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of either offense. In addition, he contends that the circuit court erroneously concluded that he was a persistent repeater under Wis. Stat. § 939.62(2m) (2007-08).
¶ 2. We conclude that there was sufficient evidence for a jury to find Long guilty of second-degree sexual assault and false imprisonment. However, we also determine that the circuit court…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. PoellingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. LangloisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017
- Andersen v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
- State v. Donald P. CoughlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. BarwickCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
- State v. FreerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.