Legal Opinion

Watson v. First Nat. Bank of Coleman

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1926No. 620-4402PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, P. J.

The nature of this case is fully stated by the Court of Civil Appeals. See 271 S. W. 438. Briefly, the Watsons executed a note for $5,170.50, payable to the hank. It was secured by a deed of trust, duly acknowledged and recorded, on 82 acres of land. The note was renewed before it was barred, and the renewal note expressly provided that it was in renewal of the balance due on the original debt, identifying the same, and the deed of trust securing the same. . But this renewal note and deed of trust was not acknowledged and placed of record. The bank sued upon the renewal note for its debt, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. R. B. Templeman & Son v. KempnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Adams v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Amonette v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Bellamy v. Oklahoma Farm Mortgage Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  5. McCracken v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Jasper State Bank v. BraswellTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Owen v. City of EastlandTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Cadle Co. v. Butler, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  4. Yates v. DarbyTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Bruce v. RepublicBank-South Austin (In Re Bruce)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API