Ramsey v. California Packing Corp.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of nonsuit granted at the end of plaintiff’s case on the motion of the defendants California Packing Corporation and E. Powers, who interposed their respective answers to the complaint. The defendants Kim and Hahn did not file an answer or answers to the complaint. The appeal is supported by a bill of exceptions.
The facts, in summary, may be stated as follows: Plaintiff was the owner in fee of 320 acres of ranch property which he leased to the defendants Kim and Hahn on the first day of November, 1917, for the term of one year wherein, plaintiff…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lee v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Merced Bank v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. CalhounSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Henrici v. South Feather Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Murray v. Tulare Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Farmers' Nat. Bank v. Missouri Livestock Commission Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Johnson v. CasperIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Southern Wisconsin Acceptance Co. v. PaullWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Stockyards National Bank v. B. Harris Wool Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- I. S. Chapman & Co. v. UleryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.