Legal Opinion

Mamula v. Local 1211, United Steelworkers

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 61-531PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOURLEY, Chief Judge.

In this proceeding arising under the provisions of the Landrum-Griffin Act, defendants’ motion for summary judgment relates solely to the jurisdiction of this Court under Title I, § 101(a) (5), 29 U.S.C.A. § 411(a) (5).

The following question is posed:

In an action under the LandrumGriffin Act, does the United States District Court have jurisdiction under Title I, Section 101(a) (5), 29 U.S.C.A. § 411(a) (5), of said Act to review allegedly improper disciplinary action taken against a local union officer in which said disciplinary action the national and local union remove…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nicholas Mamula v. United Steelworkers of America, an Unincorporated Labor Union, and I. W. Abel, International Secretary-Treasurer ThereofCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  2. Jackson v. the Martin CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1960
  3. Flaherty v. McDonaldDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1960
  4. Colpo v. Highway Truck Drivers and Helpers, Local 107District Court, D. Delaware · 1961
  5. Mamula v. Local 1211, United Steelworkers of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Air Line Stewards and Stewardesses Association, Local 550, Twu, Afl-Cio v. Transport Workers Union of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
  2. Fogle v. United SteelworkersDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Bragg v. International Union of Operating EngineersDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API