Mamula v. Local 1211, United Steelworkers
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
GOURLEY, Chief Judge.
In this proceeding arising under the provisions of the Landrum-Griffin Act, defendants’ motion for summary judgment relates solely to the jurisdiction of this Court under Title I, § 101(a) (5), 29 U.S.C.A. § 411(a) (5).
The following question is posed:
In an action under the LandrumGriffin Act, does the United States District Court have jurisdiction under Title I, Section 101(a) (5), 29 U.S.C.A. § 411(a) (5), of said Act to review allegedly improper disciplinary action taken against a local union officer in which said disciplinary action the national and local union remove…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nicholas Mamula v. United Steelworkers of America, an Unincorporated Labor Union, and I. W. Abel, International Secretary-Treasurer ThereofCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Jackson v. the Martin CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1960
- Flaherty v. McDonaldDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1960
- Colpo v. Highway Truck Drivers and Helpers, Local 107District Court, D. Delaware · 1961
- Mamula v. Local 1211, United Steelworkers of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Air Line Stewards and Stewardesses Association, Local 550, Twu, Afl-Cio v. Transport Workers Union of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
- Fogle v. United SteelworkersDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- Bragg v. International Union of Operating EngineersDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1970