Legal Opinion
Smith v. Wm. D. Keith Motors Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided February 28, 1927No. 26444PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.
Plaintiff sued for the recovery of an automobile and caused same to be sequestered. Defendant moved to dissolve the sequestration on the ground that plaintiff’s allegations as to the ownership of said automobile were false and untrue.
I
The motion to dissolve was referred to, and tried with the merits, and defendant ■ was alldwed $250 as attorney’s fees for dissolving the writ; from which judgment plaintiff appeals. And the only question presented is whether defendant is entitled to attorney’s fees for the dissolution of the writ as aforesaid.
II
As will appear from the foregoing, the motion to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Three Rivers Oil Co. v. LaurenceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Fariss v. SwiftSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- American Hoist & Derrick Co. v. FreySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Fabacher v. RouprichSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- Witbeck v. ReaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
3Cited by9 opinions
- Byrd v. CooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Finance Security Co. v. MexicLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
- Willis v. Mills Tooke PropertiesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
- Socola Rice Mill Co. v. GitzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Hebert v. Hurwitz Mintz Furniture Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.