Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Cooper

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 7, 1928No. 27334PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

Plaintiff sues to be declared the owner of thirteen certain mules herein sequestered. The defense is that defendant acquired them from one Matney, and that said Matney had purchased them from plaintiff. Plaintiff’s contention is that he only leased, but did not sell, said mules to Matney.

The facts are practically undisputed, but not the conclusions to be drawn therefrom. Matney says he bought the mules; plaintiff says he only leased them to Matney. And the circumstances were these, that plaintiff delivered the mules to Matney, and Matney gave plaintiff six notes aggregating $4,-750, the full…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. St. Louis Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  2. Trichel v. Home Ins.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. State ex rel. Bulkley v. Whited & Wheless, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  4. Grapico Bottling Works v. Liquid Carbonic Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  5. Doullut v. RushSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Montz v. TheardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co. v. SinclairSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  3. Finance Security Co. v. MexicLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Bedsole v. LeeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Lee Const. Co. v. L. M. Ray Const. Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API