Legal Opinion
Fariss v. Swift
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 3, 1924No. 24276PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion to Dismiss.
By THE COURT as.then constituted.
PROVOSTY, J.-
This is an attachment suit. There was judgment dismissing the main demand and dissolving the attachment with $250 damages. Defendant and appellee says that the dismissal of the main demand, carrying with it the dissolution of the attachment, constituted one judgment, while the condemnation to pay damages constituted another; that for appealing from these two judgments an order of appeal and a bond were necessary for each; that the amount of the appeal bond had to be fixed by the judge for the former whether the appeal was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. AugustusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Hays v. MayerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
3Cited by16 opinions
- Finance Security Co. v. MexicLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
- General Finance Co. of Louisiana v. VeithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Dauterive v. SternfelsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
- Smith v. Wm. D. Keith Motors Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Allith-Prouty Co. v. WallaceWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.