Legal Opinion

Murray v. Cartmell's

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 2, 1954No. 13PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

This is a proceeding in chancery for a declaratory judgment under the provisions of the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, V. S. 47, Chap. 77. The bill is met by a demurrer on the ground of lack of equity jurisdiction and that the Probate Court for the District of Addison and the Addison County Court are the only tribunals which have jurisdiction thereof. The demurrer was sustained, the bill dismissed and the plaintiff allowed exceptions. The cause is here on these exceptions.

I The bill alleges in substance that James R. Cartmell left a will which is set forth in full. It disposed of his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re: Will of PrudenzanoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1949
  2. In Re Estate of EverettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
  3. Curtis v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Vermont · 1951
  4. Kreichman v. Webster, Admr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Demag v. American Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  2. Molesworth v. University of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  3. In Re Estate of CartmellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  4. Trivento v. Commissioner of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  5. Fisher v. Town of MarlboroSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API