Legal Opinion

English Ex Rel. English v. Bousamra

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided July 2, 1998No. 1:96 CV 698PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

ENSLEN, Chief Judge.

In accordance with the Opinion entered this date,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants’ motions for summary judgment on the basis of the statute of limitations, filed February 9,1998 (dkt.nos.137,147), are GRANTED;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety with prejudice;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining motions and appeals of the magistrate judge’s orders (dkt. nos. 103, 122, 143, 144, 150, 153, 171, 228, 234, 235, & 238), are DENIED as moot;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of DEFENDANTS…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Curran v. City of DearbornDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
  2. Britt ex rel. Britt v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  3. Eight v. City of FerndaleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. Holden v. Miller-SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2014
  5. Winterhalter v. Watson Wyatt & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API