Legal Opinion

Holden v. Miller-Smith

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 20, 2014No. Case No. 1:12-cv-789PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JANET T. NEFF, District Judge.

Pending before the Court in this continuing litigation under the Individuals *730with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA1), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq., is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 27). Defendants argue that Plaintiffs failed to pursue their administrative remedies before the IDEA’S two-year statute of limitations expired and that their present claims are therefore barred. Plaintiffs filed a response in opposition to Defendants’ motion (Dkt. 30), seeking to establish equitable tolling as an exception to the IDEA’S statute of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. CTI III, LLC v. DevineDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API