Legal Opinion

Alfred W. Harre, Bernice E. Harre, David Bening v. Arthur G. Muegler

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 9, 1997No. 96-2572PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In 1990, Alfred and Bernice Harre and David Bening sued Arthur Muegler, alleging claims of fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation. During a long discovery period, Muegler failed to provide requested documents, to respond to interrogatories, or to answer deposition questions, asserting his fifth amendment privilege. As a sanction for his noncomplianee with discovery requests and orders, the district court 1 barred him from presenting undisclosed evidence or testifying at trial. He nevertheless prevailed with the jury, but the judgment was overturned because of erroneous jury instructions.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Securities And Exchange Commission v. Graystone Nash, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. 73 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1496, 70 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,644 Richard Newhouse, Cross-Appellant/appellee v. McCormick & Co., Inc., Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. Julia A. STRONG, Appellant, v. MERCANTILE TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  4. David J. Bening Alfred W. Harre v. Arthur G. MueglerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arthur G. Muegler, Jr. v. David J. Bening Alfred W. HarreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Muegler v. BerndsenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Alfred Harre v. Arthur MueglerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  4. Evans v. KrookDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  5. MUEGLER v. BENINGCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API