Legal Opinion

David J. Bening Alfred W. Harre v. Arthur G. Muegler

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 11, 1995No. 94-3933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIANA E. MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

Appellants David J. Bening and Alfred W. Harre sued Concepts Communication Management Corporation (Concepts) and three of its attorneys, including Arthur G. Muegler, to recover funds they had invested. The case went to trial against Muegler only, and the jury returned a verdict in his favor. 1 Bening and Harre appeal from the adverse judgment, alleging that the district court erred in its instructions to the jury and in denying their post-trial motions. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

I

Appellants, two Illinois farmers, invested a total of over $80,000 each…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sofka v. ThalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Coy R. GROGAN and John Henson, Appellees, v. Frank J. GARNER, Jr., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  3. Tietjens v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. American Business Interiors, Inc. v. Haworth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  5. Patricia Kay McGowne (Kozik), Jimmy Dewayne McGowne Ronald Kevin McGowne v. Challenge-Cook Bros., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schultz v. AmickDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
  2. Muegler v. BerndsenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Alfred W. Harre, Bernice E. Harre, David Bening v. Arthur G. MueglerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  4. Milhauser v. Minco Products, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  5. Alfred W. Harre v. Arthur G. MueglerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API