Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Application of Paul E. Hoch

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 30, 1970No. Patent Appeal 8323PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals 1 affirming the rejection of claims 3-6 of application serial No. 233,885, filed October 29, 1962, entitled “Novel Chlorinated Benzoyl Chloride and Derivatives Thereof and Methods of Preparing Same.” 2 We affirm.

Claim 3 is drawn to a genus of three compounds — 4, 5, 6, a, a, a-hexachloro-3-toluic acid and the corresponding acid chloride and anilide — which have the following structural formulae:

Claims 4-6 are species claims drawn to the acid chloride, acid, and anilide, respectively. The usefulness of these…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Application of Viktor PapeschCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Application of Harold G. Petering and Harry H. FallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumüller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BänderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  4. Application of Alan B. HuellmantelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  5. Application of John P. LambooyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  3. In re MayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  4. In re PayneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  5. In Re Rita S. Jones, Michael T. Chirchirillo and Johnny L. BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API