Legal Opinion
Healy-Owen-Hartzell Co. v. Montevideo Farmers & Merchants Elevator Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 18, 1927No. 25,828PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
The plaintiff recovered judgment for something like $50,000 against some of the defendants in this action and in lesser amounts agaiDst the others. The case is reported as Healy-Owen-Hartzell Co. v. Montevideo F. & M. Elev. Co. 165 Minn. 330, 206 N. W. 646, 44 A. L. R. 1238. In supplementary proceedings under GL. S. 1923, § 9450, et seq., disclosures were had before the referee. Upon the report of the referee, the plaintiff and defendant Northwestern National Bank moved for the appointment of a receiver. The motion was denied and they appeal.
When a debtor conveys land, and his judgment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Healy-Owen-Hartzell Co. v. Montevideo Farmers & Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Spokane Merchants Ass'n v. CoffeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Doland v. Burns Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Wilkins v. CoreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brownell Realty, Inc v. KellyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Girard v. Michener (In Re Michener)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Ginsberg v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934