Healy-Owen-Hartzell Co. v. Montevideo Farmers & Merchants Elevator Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
This is an action for an accounting and to have the validity of a certain mortgage, upon the elevator property) in question, held by the defendant Montevideo Bank determined, and to have a lien, which plaintiff claims to hold upon said elevator property, declared a first lien thereon, and for judgment in form and amount as the equity of the case may demand. • The cause was tried upon the pleadings and proofs, and submitted to the trial court. Very full findings of fact were made and filed, and judgment was ordered, in effect, as follows:(1)' That plaintiff is without recourse against the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Wilson v. HayesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Midland National Bank v. Security Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Ward v. HackettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- McDonald Bros. v. KoltesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Markville State Bank v. SteinbringSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Phipps-Reynolds Co. v. McIlroy Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Holbert v. WermerskirchenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Kuhlman v. Granite City Investing Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Schlozer v. HeckerothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.