Legal Opinion

Ginsberg v. Davis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 9, 1934No. 29,753Published

1Opinion of the Court

LORING, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order in proceedings supplementary to execution denying the plaintiff’s application for the appointment of a receiver for the defendants’ nonexempt property.

The defendants, Davis and Helfman, and Nathan Ginsberg were stockholders in the Davis Manufacturing Company prior to Ginsberg’s death in 1930. That company was engaged in the manufac ture of furniture. The same persons were interested in the Gopher Upholstering Company, the name of which was later changed to the Sterling Manufacturing Company. After1 the death of Ginsberg, Davis and Helfman…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Flint v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  2. Bean v. HeronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Healy-Owen-Hartzell Co. v. Montevideo Farmers & Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Poppitz v. RognesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API