Legal Opinion

Wilkins v. Corey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 2, 1926No. 25,369PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

This is an appeal from an order appointing a receiver in proceedings supplementary to the execution.

Plaintiff made a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that no settled case has been allowed or signed by the trial court. The motion is denied. Even if the return were defective in this respect, it would not be a ground for dismissing the appeal. But here the evidence was taken and reported to the court by a referee duly appointed for that purpose and is sufficiently authenticated by his certificate. Since the change in practice by which the original record and files are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Flint v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  2. Bean v. HeronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. Towne v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. Poppitz v. RognesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  5. Meister v. AdamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Village of Aurora v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Schmid v. BallardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Healy-Owen-Hartzell Co. v. Montevideo Farmers & Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  4. Longueville v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API