Legal Opinion

Lenins v. K-Mart Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1990No. 8918SC1015PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Judge.

Plaintiffs bring forward twenty-two assignments of error. Those assignments of error have been combined below into major topical areas.

I: Alleged Prejudicial Expressions of Opinion by the Trial Judge.

Plaintiffs allege that the trial judge made certain statements to the jury which were prejudicial expressions of opinion and were therefore grounds for a new trial.

A. A statement to the jury during jury selection.

During jury selection, the trial judge stated to the prospective jurors:

Now, this case involves an incident at K-Mart, where Mrs. Lenins was a shopper. . . and at which time…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Link v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. ConroyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Bratcher v. Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008
  3. Efird v. RileyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
  4. Sheaffer v. County of ChathamDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
  5. Buser v. Southern Food Service, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API