Legal Opinion
Wedemeyer v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 28, 1995No. C5-95-1391PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge. *
A municipality’s temporary suspension of a conditional use permit application to operate a business, which did not conform to the municipality’s comprehensive zoning plan, pending consideration and adoption of a moratorium ordinance on the issuance of such permits did not exceed the municipality’s authority nor was the temporary suspension enacted in bad faith or in a discriminatory fashion.
FACTS
Appellant Charles Wedemeyer leased a vacant store in the Camden neighborhood of Minneapolis in December 1993. The Minneapolis comprehensive zoning plan placed the store…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of MinnetonkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- The Alexander Co. v. City of OwatonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Concept Properties, LLP v. City of MinnetristaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Semler Construction, Inc. v. City of HanoverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- City of Crystal v. Fantasy House, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997