State v. Andren
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
This is a sentencing appeal. After pleading guilty to criminal sexual conduct in the second degree, Minn.Stat. § 609.343(a) (1982), appellant received the presumptive executed sentence with an upward dura-tional departure. Appellant claims the trial court erred in refusing to depart disposi-tionally and in departing durationally. We affirm the refusal to depart dispositionally but reverse and remand for resentencing in conformity with the presumptive durational sentence.
FACTS
On January 27, 1983, appellant motioned to a seven-year-old girl to enter his house. She…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. BackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. StummSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. CermakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. HagenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. DelkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. AndrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. AndrenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. NeslerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985