State v. Delk
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
On appeal from his sentencing for second-degree unintentional murder, appellant argues that his sentence must be overturned because, although it is within the presumptive-sentence range, it is longer than the “middle-of-the-box” presumptive sentence. Because any sentence within the guideline range is not a departure from the presumptive sentence, we affirm.
FACTS
In November 2005, David Delk attended a birthday party in a St. Cloud apartment and was asked to leave. Later that night, Delk returned to the apartment with his cousin appellant Antonio Delk and others for an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Delk v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Jose Armando Padilla v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Bryant Jerome StephensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Colleen Purificacion LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.