Legal Opinion

State v. Delk

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 4, 2010No. A09-1125PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUDSON, Judge.

On appeal from his sentencing for second-degree unintentional murder, appellant argues that his sentence must be overturned because, although it is within the presumptive-sentence range, it is longer than the “middle-of-the-box” presumptive sentence. Because any sentence within the guideline range is not a departure from the presumptive sentence, we affirm.

FACTS

In November 2005, David Delk attended a birthday party in a St. Cloud apartment and was asked to leave. Later that night, Delk returned to the apartment with his cousin appellant Antonio Delk and others for an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. FordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Tucker v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  2. Delk v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Jose Armando Padilla v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  4. State of Minnesota v. Bryant Jerome StephensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  5. State of Minnesota v. Colleen Purificacion LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API