State v. Nesler
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
In this sentencing appeal the defendant challenges both the dispositional and dura-tional departure of sentence following his conviction of assault in the third degree, Minn.Stat. § 609.223 (1984). We find the court justified in departing, and we affirm.
FACTS
Appellant met Karen Ashelin in a Wino-na bar on November 13, 1984. Appellant had previously lived with Ashelin, but their relationship was a stormy one, filled with many episodes of appellant physically assaulting her. In January 1984 Ashelin obtained a protective order which prohibited appellant from entering her…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. WinchellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. WomackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. HeywoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. PeakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. SchenkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. VanWertCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989