Legal Opinion

State v. Cermak

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 17, 1984No. C1-82-478PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This is a sentencing appeal pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 244.11 (1982). Defendant pleaded guilty to six counts of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree, one count for each of six children. The presumptive sentence for criminal sexual conduct in the first degree (a severity level VIII offense) by a person with defendant’s criminal history score (zero) is an executed prison term of 43 (41-45) months. Pursuant to Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines and Commentary, II.F.2 (1983), the trial court was free to sentence defendant consecutively without having to give any reasons.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. State v. ProfitSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. State v. BrusvenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Rairdon v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. State v. CermakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Ture v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. CermakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API