Bernardi v. City of Scranton
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEALON, Chief Judge.
The above-captioned actions were commenced by former employees of the City of Scran.ton who assert that their respective discharges violated their rights under state and federal law. The defendants have moved to consolidate these two actions.1 For the reasons set forth below, the court will deny the motion for consolidation.
Plaintiff Bernardi filed his complaint in Civil No. 83-0202 on February 15, 1983. Bernardi was discharged from his position as Foreman of the Bureau of Highways of Scranton’s Department of Public Works on March 24, 1982. According to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rohm & Haas Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1981
- Turner v. Transportacion Maritima Mexicana S. A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Arroyo v. ChardonDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1981
3Cited by19 opinions
- Grayson v. K-Mart Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994
- Bailey v. Northern Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- Brown v. City of Shamokin Police DepartmentDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Brown v. Shamokin Police DepartmentDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- CARTEE-HARING v. CENTRAL BUCKS SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.