Legal Opinion
Bergman v. Parnes Brothers, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 1, 1971PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*561The opinion of the Court was delivered hy
Proctor, J.
This is a Workmen’s Compensation ease. Compensation was denied by the Division of Compensation and judgment was affirmed by the county court. On petitioner’s appeal, the Appellate Division by a divided court affirmed the judgment of the county court. Petitioner appeals to this Court as of right. B. 2:2-1 (a) (2).
The petitioner, Sam Bergman, was employed as a presser by respondent Parnés Bros., Inc. in its garment factory in Ereehold. He was compensated on a piece work basis rather than paid a salary or an hourly wage. Prior to March 12,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Claim of Ingraham v. Lane Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Penn Stevedoring Corp. v. CardilloDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hornyak v. the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Mangigian v. Franz Warner Assoc., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- DiNardo v. Newark Bd. of Ed.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Pearce v. NJ Highway AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Williams v. Remco IndustriesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.