Legal Opinion
Pearce v. NJ Highway Authority
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 6, 1973PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
122 N.J. Super. 342 (1973)
300 A.2d 358
EMMA PEARCE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
NEW JERSEY HIGHWAY AUTHORITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted November 20, 1972.
Decided February 6, 1973.
Before Judges FRITZ, LYNCH and FULOP.
Messrs. Rosen & Kanov, attorneys for appellant (Mr. Edward Roy Rosen, on the brief).
Mr. William K. Miller, attorney for respondent.
2Per curiam
This workmen's compensation appeal represents another arrow from the quiver reserved for assault on the exclusionary "going and coming" rule.
Petitioner, employed as an "executive secretary" by respondent…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Hammond v. the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Gullo v. American Lead Pencil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
- Fisher v. Tidewater Building Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
- Moosebrugger v. Prospect Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Livingstone v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Hornyak v. the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Mahon v. Reilly's Radio Cabs, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Nebesne v. CrocettiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
- Ryan v. KasaskerisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.