State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
Petitioner seeks annulment of an award of workmen’s compensation benefits to an employee of its insured. As will appear, we have concluded that contrary to petitioner’s contention the evidence supports the determination that the injury arose out of and was incurred in the course of the employment, and hence was compensable.
John R. Cardoza, then aged 23, entered the employment of Poso Canal Company on March 17, 1964, as a mechanic. On July 18, 1964, he and three fellow employees decided to swim in a nearby canal owned by another company. It was 105 degrees in the shade, some 109 or 110 degrees…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Cal. Cas. Ind. Exch. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Reinert v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Jordan v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- McCarty v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- North American Rockwell Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Pruitt v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Wickham v. North American Rockwell Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.