Hornyak v. the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
63 N.J. 99 (1973)
305 A.2d 65
MICHAEL HORNYAK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued February 20, 1973.
Decided May 21, 1973.
Mrs. Ruth Rabstein argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Pellettieri & Rabstein, attorneys).
Mr. Thomas J. Mannion, Jr. argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Capehart & Scatchard, attorneys).
The opinion of the Court was delivered by JACOBS, J.
The Appellate Division, in an unreported opinion, affirmed the denial of a workmen's compensation award to the plaintiff; we certified on his…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Bryant v. FissellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Hinojosa v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Howard v. Harwood's Restaurant Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Ricciardi v. Damar Products Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Schreifer v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lozano v. Frank DeLuca ConstructionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Livingstone v. Abraham & Straus, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Wunschel v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- McClure v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Ward v. DavidowitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.