Legal Opinion
Humphries v. County of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 30, 2009No. 05-56467PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion, filed November 5, 2008, [547 F.3d 1117], is amended as follows:
1. At [547 F.3d at 1126], replace “susbstantiated” with “substantiated.”
2. At [547 F.3d at 1128 n. 8], replace “If the parties provide” with “If a party provides.”
3. At [547 F.3d at 1130], replace “County’s CACI-related policies” with “County’s and State’s CACI-related policies.”
4. At [547 F.3d at 1142 n. 15], replace “district court” with “district attorney”; also replace “affect” with “effect.”
5. At [547 F.3d at 1143] replace “very type of liberty interest” with “very type of interference with a liberty…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Clouthier v. County of Contra CostaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Courtney Bird v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Los Angeles County v. HumphriesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Manuel Vasquez v. Tony RackauckasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Mead v. Independence AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.