Legal Opinion

Colden v. Costello

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 6, 1942No. Civ. 13302PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, J.

Respondent is the widow of Charles J. Golden, deceased, and entitled under his will to one-fifth of his estate remaining after the payment of certain specific bequests. In the will the share left to respondent was declared to be inclusive of her interest in the community property. The estate is situated partly in California and partly in Texas. Respondent claims that all of the California estate and a large part of that in Texas is community property. The other beneficiaries deny that respondent’s community interest exceeds her share under the will. The ease is one in which respondent is…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BurdickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. In re the Estate of BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Estate of Dunphy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Barkly v. CopelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Bath v. ValdezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Colden v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Willson v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Stiebel v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Estate of BaglioneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Central Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API