Legal Opinion
Kiernan v. Roadway Express, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 23, 1988No. 5779PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The defendant, Roadway Express, Inc. (Roadway), is appealing from the decision of the compensation review division (CRD) reversing an order by the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) transferring liability for compensation benefits payable to the claimant,1 Angela Kiernan, from Roadway to the defendant Second Injury and Compensation Assurance Fund (Fund).2 Roadway claims that the CRD erred (1) in determining that the Fund was not liable for payments, and (2) in considering the Fund’s appeal from the decision of the commissioner due to procedural defects in that appeal. We find…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Farricielli v. Connecticut Personnel Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Barlow v. KaminskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Tramontano v. DilietoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Misiurka v. Maple Hill Farms, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Davis v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Vaillancourt v. New Britain Machine/LittonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Soares v. Max Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Kiernan v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988