Legal Opinion

In re Hock

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 1, 1948No. 5461PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJackson, Judge

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that .of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting all of the claims, 19 to 30 inclusive, of appellant’s application, serial No. 444,153, for a patent “For Circulator.” Claims 19 to 23 inclusive and claim 30 were rejected as unpatentable over the prior art. Claims 24 to 29 inclusive were rejected as being drawn to a nonelected species, and, therefore, need not be considered in this court upon their merits. Should we find a generic claim allowable, the rejection as to claims 24 to 29 inclusive…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re CoeyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  2. In re RenstromCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
  3. In re RoseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  4. Application of CraigeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  5. Application of Daniel Morton RoseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API