Legal Opinion

In re Rose

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 22, 1955No. 6080PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the holding of the Primary Examiner rejecting as unpatentable claims 29 to 33, the only remaining claims in appellant’s application for a patent on a “Package of, Apparatus for Packaging and Method of Handling and Storing Lumber.”

The appealed claims relate to a lumber package which is composed of individually banded bundles of lumber which vary in length. Each individual bundle of lumber consists of layers of strips of lumber which are approximately the same length. Each layer consists of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re HockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  2. In re YountCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  3. In re CorbettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944
  4. In re GilletteCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re DeJarlaisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. Matter of the Application of Gordon M. De JarlaisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  3. Application of Birdsall P. Lawson, Deceased (Pilling Chain Co., Assignee)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API