Legal Opinion

Application of Craige

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 10, 1951No. Patent Appeals 5790PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Judge.

We are here called upon to review a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims 6 to 10, inclusive, and 12 to 14, inclusive, of an application for new and useful improvements in “Anthelmintic Compositions," serial No. 592,920, filed May 9, 1945.

Claims 7, 9, 10, 12, and 13 were rejected as not being of the elected species. Claims 6, 8, and 14 were rej ected as unpatentable over the prior art. One claim was allowed. The former group may not be considered here upon the merits. In re Hock, 168…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re ThuauCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  2. Application of WilliamsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  3. In re HockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  4. In re HallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Holcomb v. HolcombCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API