In re Renstrom
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the-United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting all of the claims, Nos. 1 to 5, inclusive, in appellant’s. *1021application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to a hair curler.
Claims 1 and 4 are sufficiently illustrative of the appealed claims. They read:
1. A hair curler comprising a tubular body having diametrically opposite perforations adjacent one end, a clamping arm having a portion straddling said end of said body and having opposed perforations aligned with the body…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re LobdellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
- In re HockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of the Application of Edward A. Patton and Forrest F. BeilCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Application of Daniel Morton RoseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
- In re PattonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956