Legal Opinion

In re Renstrom

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 12, 1949No. 5573PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the-United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting all of the claims, Nos. 1 to 5, inclusive, in appellant’s. *1021application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to a hair curler.

Claims 1 and 4 are sufficiently illustrative of the appealed claims. They read:

1. A hair curler comprising a tubular body having diametrically opposite perforations adjacent one end, a clamping arm having a portion straddling said end of said body and having opposed perforations aligned with the body…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re LobdellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  2. In re HockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of the Application of Edward A. Patton and Forrest F. BeilCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. Application of Daniel Morton RoseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  3. In re PattonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API