Legal Opinion

Frericks v. Highland Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1998No. Docket 192224PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

In this zoning dispute, plaintiffs appeal as of right from a judgment upholding the validity of several sections of Highland Township’s zoning ordinance, but declaring that the rezoning of plaintiffs’ property to R-l-A (residential single-family district with a minimum lot size of three acres) was invalid and providing that the Highland Township Board is free to rezone the property. Defendants cross appealed from the judgment and a separate order denying their motion for costs and attorney fees, but withdrew the cross appeal at oral argument. We affirm.

I. underlying facts

Plaintiffs own a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Christine Building Co. v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. LlewellynMichigan Supreme Court · 1977

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Adams v. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Candelaria v. B C General Contractors, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Yankee Springs Township v. FoxMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Shepherd Montessori Center Milan v. Ann Arbor Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Kenkel v. Stanley WorksMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API