Frericks v. Highland Township
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
In this zoning dispute, plaintiffs appeal as of right from a judgment upholding the validity of several sections of Highland Township’s zoning ordinance, but declaring that the rezoning of plaintiffs’ property to R-l-A (residential single-family district with a minimum lot size of three acres) was invalid and providing that the Highland Township Board is free to rezone the property. Defendants cross appealed from the judgment and a separate order denying their motion for costs and attorney fees, but withdrew the cross appeal at oral argument. We affirm.
I. underlying facts
Plaintiffs own a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Christine Building Co. v. City of TroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. LlewellynMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Adams v. Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Candelaria v. B C General Contractors, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Yankee Springs Township v. FoxMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Shepherd Montessori Center Milan v. Ann Arbor Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Kenkel v. Stanley WorksMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.