Legal Opinion

Corning Glass Works v. Max Dichter Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 31, 1960No. 4837PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blandin, J,

I. The first issue before us is whether our Fair Trade Law (RSA ch. 357) violates the due process clause of our Constitution, Pt. I, Art. 15th.

The Law provides in substance that no contract which relates to the sale or resale of a commodity bearing a trademark or the producer’s name and which is in “fair and open competition with commodities of the same general class produced by others shall be deemed in violation of any law of the state” because the contract contains provisions “that the buyer will not resell such commodity at less than the minimum price stipulated by the vendor;…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Bourjois Sales Corp. v. DorfmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Liquor Store v. Continental Distilling Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1949
  5. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. White River Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Bulova Watch Co. v. Zale Jewelry Co. of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Piper v. MeredithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  4. Chasan v. Village District of EastmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  5. Carbur's, Inc. v. a & S Office Concepts, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API