Legal Opinion

Carbur's, Inc. v. a & S Office Concepts, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 12, 1982No. 81-425PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants, A & S Office Concepts, Inc. (A & S) and its directors and officers, Franklin Albanese and Dennis Surrette, appeal from the granting of the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment. RSA 491:8-a (Supp. 1981). We hold that based on the pleadings and affidavits before it, the trial court properly granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

Because of defects in the computer equipment and software which the plaintiff had purchased from the defendant A & S, the plaintiff rejected the equipment and A & S agreed to refund to the plaintiff the full purchase price of $24,205;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arsenault v. WillisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. Corning Glass Works v. Max Dichter Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1960
  3. Badr Export & Import, Inc. v. Groveton Papers Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. Donnelly v. Kearsarge Telephone Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Daboul v. Town of HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of FranklinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  3. Provencal v. ProvencalSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. Cooperman v. MacNeilSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. D. W. Clark Road Equipment, Inc. v. Murray Walter, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API