Legal Opinion
In Re Glaxosmithkline Plc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 7, 2007No. A04-2150PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
732 N.W.2d 257 (2007)
In the Matter of GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC.
No. A04-2150.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
June 7, 2007.
Michael A. Lindsay, Dorsey & Whitney, Minneapolis, MN, George S. Cary, Sara D. Schotland, Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, Washington, D.C., for Appellant.
Mike Hatch, Minnesota Attorney General, Michael J. Vanselow, Paul B. Civello, St. Paul, MN, for Respondent.
Charles R. Shreffler, Mohrman & Kaardal, Minneapolis, MN, Elizabeth B. McCallum, Howrey LLP, Margaret M. Zwisler, Charles H. Samel, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, D.C., for Amicus Curiae.
Heard, considered, and decided by…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- Milner v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 292 v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- KSTP-TV v. Ramsey CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Steve Carlson v. Steve Simon, Minnesota Secretary of State, Minnesota State LegislatureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.