Legal Opinion

International Management Services, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 21, 2007No. 07-831 CPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge.

This postaward bid protest comes before the court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Defendant seeks dismissal of plaintiffs complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Specifically, defendant contends that plaintiff lacks standing to bring this protest, that plaintiff improperly seeks review of nonjusticiable determinations, and that plaintiff is prohibited from challenging the terms of the solicitation once the contract has been awarded. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Linc Government Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. PlanetSpace Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  4. Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Crassociates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API