International Management Services, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
This postaward bid protest comes before the court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Defendant seeks dismissal of plaintiffs complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Specifically, defendant contends that plaintiff lacks standing to bring this protest, that plaintiff improperly seeks review of nonjusticiable determinations, and that plaintiff is prohibited from challenging the terms of the solicitation once the contract has been awarded. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Linc Government Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- PlanetSpace Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Crassociates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.