Legal Opinion
Hammes v. Brumley
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided December 29, 1995No. 49S02-9512-CV-1382, 72S01-9512-CV-1383, 49S02-9505-CV-503, 55S01-9512-CV-1381 and 64S03-9505-CV-604PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
oN PETITIONS TO TRANSFER
SULLIVAN, Justice.
Each of these five cases requires us to decide one or more issues which arose when a claim in a lawsuit filed in state court also constituted an asset or a debt of a debtor in federal bankruptey proceedings.
Hammes v. Brumley, Hendrix v. Page, Shewmaker v. Etter, and Stallsworth v. Munoz each present the issue of whether a state law claim filed in violation of a principle of federal bankruptcy law can be saved by a subsequent order of a federal bankruptcy court, notwithstanding the intervening expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. In…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Harold J. Hawkins and Eugenia B. Hawkins v. Landmark Finance Company, in Re Harold J. Hawkins and Eugenia B. Hawkins, DebtorsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- In the Matter of Gladys E. Shondel, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Pence v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Higgins v. HaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Pillsbury Co., Inc. v. Wells Dairy, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2008
- First Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. WhorleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Abbott v. BatesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Cittadine v. Indiana Department of TransportationIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Wabash Grain, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.