Broadway v. . Grimes
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Adams, J\
It is not controverted tbat tbe defendants bottled tbe beverage and sealed it in “a regulation coca-cola bottle with a regulation cap,” or tbat they sold it to a distributor, or tbat tbe plaintiff purchased it in due course of trade and ultimately became tbe consumer. Tbe regulation bottle is opaque or colored to such extent tbat a noxious substance in it would not as a rule be readily observable. Tbe verdict establishes tbe negligence of tbe defendants and tbe consequent injury suffered by tbe plaintiff. Tbe first question is whether tbe defendants as manufacturers of tbe drink were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Cashwell v. Fayetteville Pepsi-Cola Bottling WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Dail v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Perry v. Kelford Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Grant v. Graham Chero-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Webb v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
- Penn v. Inferno Manufacturing CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Enloe v. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Corprew v. Geigy Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Corum v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.