Legal Opinion

Rabe v. Consolidated Ice Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York

Decided February 2, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, District Judge.

This is an action to recover damages for an injury alleged to have been received by the plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant. The defendant demurs on the ground that the complaint does not state a cause of action. The *458complaint will be deemed to contain every fact which by fair intendment can be implied from its allegations. The complaint bears evidence of being hastily drawn. It contains averments which might better have been omitted and omits averments which, it would seem, might better have been stated. Notwithstanding this it is thought that the complaint…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Southern Pac. Co. v. LaffertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1893
  3. Pullman's Palace-Car Co. v. HarkinsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brooks v. De Soto Oil Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Boswell v. Whitehead Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Boswell v. . Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API