Boswell v. . Hosiery Mills
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The complaint succinctly alleges: (a) that A. R. Boswell is next of friend to Freeman Boswell, who is a minor, and authorized to bring the suit; (b) defendant White Hosiery Mills is a corporation engaged in business of manufacturing and dealing in hosiery, and Freeman Boswell was employed by it; (c) that Freeman Boswell was employed by defendant in the hosiery mill engaged in what is known as "topping" or preparing the tops of stockings for the machines, and while passing about his work the bottom of the left leg of his overalls was caught by a rapidly revolving shaft and he was suddenly…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Whalen v. . Citizens' Gas Light Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Moore v. Chicago Bridge & Iron WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Dunnevant v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Homestake Min. Co. v. FullertonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Biles v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Spivey v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Griggs v. . Sears, Roebuck Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Muldrow v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Muldrow v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951