Boswell v. Whitehead Hosiery Mills
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
Tbe following map was in evidence. Tbe plaintiff’s evidence substantiated tbe allegations of tbe complaint. Tbe evidence of Freeman Boswell, in part, was tbat be bad been working at tbe hosiery mill three or four months. “At tbe place I got caught two machines bad been taken out, one on each side of tbe shafting. They bad been out for sometime. This left a pretty good space. Since I bad been working there bad been some cans there, but these bad been moved. Tbe space between tbe machines across tbe shafting, was just room enough for a pretty good size can to sit, about two feet wide. Tin cans…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Dolner v. The MonticelloU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1870
- Whalen v. . Citizens' Gas Light Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Moore v. Chicago Bridge & Iron WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Dunnevant v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Homestake Min. Co. v. FullertonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Spivey v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Boswell v. . Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Hinshaw v. . PepperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Ensley v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Muldrow v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951