Legal Opinion

Raff v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 15, 1917No. Docket No. 3, No. 188PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Bill in equity, original jurisdiction, Miscellaneous Docket No. 3, No. 188, to enjoin defendants from erecting a convention hall, in case of Harry Raff, a citizen and taxpayer of the City of Philadelphia, in his own behalf and in behalf of such citizens and taxpayers of said city as may join herein, v. City of Philadelphia; Thomas B. Smith, Mayor; George E. Datesman, Director, Department of Public Works; John M. Walton, City Controller, and William McCoach, City Treasurer of…

Read the full summary

Bill in equity, original jurisdiction, Miscellaneous Docket No. 3, No. 188, to enjoin defendants from erecting a convention hall, in case of Harry Raff, a citizen and taxpayer of the City of Philadelphia, in his own behalf and in behalf of such citizens and taxpayers of said city as may join herein, v. City of Philadelphia; Thomas B. Smith, Mayor; George E. Datesman, Director, Department of Public Works; John M. Walton, City Controller, and William McCoach, City Treasurer of the City of Philadelphia. Bill in equity for an injunction. .Original jurisdiction.' The opinion of the Supreme Court…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Brown,

In pursuance of an ordinance approved April 21,1911, the municipal authorities of the City of Philadelphia submitted to its electors the question"of an increase of its indebtedness in the sum of $9,750,000, which embraced, inter alia, an item of $1,500,000 “for the erection of a convention hall.” The election was held May 23, 1911, and a majority of the electors voted for the proposed increase. In the notice of the election, and on the ballots furnished to the voters, the item of $1,500,000 was said to be “for the erection of a convention hall.” On June 19,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keller v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  2. Commonwealth v. BellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  3. Witman v. City of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hyam v. Upper Montgomery Joint AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Pleasant Hills Borough v. Jefferson TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Charleroi Lumber Co. v. Bentleyville Borough School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. McAnulty v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Rider v. Lenoir CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API